Archive for the ‘liberty’ Category

Birmingham ban anathematizes atheism

Tuesday, July 29th, 2008

In a deeply stupid move Birmingham City Council has blocked its vast army of employees from accessing atheist websites. The atheist sites are blocked under a policy that prevents staff access to ’sites that promote witchcraft, the paranormal, sexual deviancy and criminal activity’, says the BBC. It’s not quite clear into which of these categories atheism is deemed to fall.

The National Secular Society says the move is discriminatory (and it does look that way, given that sites relating to ’Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and other religions’ are apparently not being blocked, but atheist sites are) and they intend to fight the Birmingham ban. However, this quote from National Secular Society President Terry Anderson caught my eye:

It is discriminatory not only against atheists but they also are banning access to sites to do with witchcraft. Witchcraft these days is called Wicca, which is an actual legitimate and recognised religion.

It’s nothing of the sort: everything about ‘wicca’ from its name downwards is a load of made-up tosh. But then the opinion of a professional secularist on what is or is not a legitimate religion is bound to be a little warped.

greycat.org

Netherlands confronts cartoon threat

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

Reporting on the arrest of the cartoonist Gregorius Nekschot in the Netherlands, the Wall Street Journal reveals that the Dutch Government certainly has its priorities right in the fight for free speech and liberty against obscurantism and religiously-inspired totalitarianism. Officials from the intelligence service, the interior ministry, the prosecutor’s office and other high-powered state bodies, under the leadership of a senior counter-terrorism officer, to create the top-secret …

Interdepartmental Working Group on Cartoons.

The title hardly sounds ominous, but the existence of this body is deeply troubling to anyone concerned about free speech (not to mention the priorities of government). The group is intended to alert Dutch officials to any cartoon-related dangers the Netherlands may face (unfunny Garfield strips? No, I don’t think that’s what they mean) and has no censorship role, we are assured. But then, no imposition of censorship is needed when an entire culture is bending over backwards to censor itself.

More at Greenspiece and Gates of Vienna.

greycat.org

The price of liberty: £3000 per diem

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008

If this report is correct, Brown’s Britain is about to achieve a new low.

The government is expected to offer a last-minute compensation deal to help push the 42-day detention plan through. Under this, any suspect held for more than 28 days and later not charged could receive £3,000 for each extra day in custody, the BBC has learned.

We have now reached a point where the British Government is happy to put civil liberties up for sale.

greycat.org

Most-read this week: Hobbes

Thursday, December 13th, 2007

Frontispiece from Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan, 1651 

The most popular essay on greycat.org over the past week has been ‘Hobbes and liberty: the subject’s sphere of liberty in Leviathan.

Hobbes’s assertion that ‘Feare and Liberty are consistent’ (II: xxi, 262) has caused a certain amount of puzzlement and confusion: how freely can a person robbed at gunpoint really be said to be acting when he hands over his wallet? Yet it is consistent with Hobbes’s view that liberty can only be restricted by an external agent. If the robber knocks his victim to the ground and restrains him physically while extracting his wallet from his pocket, then the victim’s freedom has been restricted; but if the victim reaches into his own pocket and hands the robber his wallet out of fear that he will be shot if he does not, he has chosen that course of action freely, while others, no matter how unpalatable, remain open to him; and he has removed his wallet and surrendered it with his own hands and of his own volition. This is an important point for understanding the nature of the covenant which gives rise to Hobbes’s Commonwealth, for its ultimate motivation is fear (‘The Passions that encline men to Peace, are Feare of Death’ (I: xiii, 188)), and yet it is freely arrived at by all concerned.

Hobbes’s Leviathan is commonly seen as an argument for absolute despotism on the part of the sovereign and absolute submission on the part of the subject; yet Hobbes asserts that individual liberty is inalienable. How can these positions be reconciled? This is the question explored in ’Hobbes and liberty: the subject’s sphere of liberty in Leviathan‘. Click here to read the essay, in full and for free.

Picture: Frontispiece from Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan, 1651 (detail). [Source]

greycat.org

Mill’s ‘War is an ugly thing’: some topical thoughts

Monday, October 15th, 2007

The United States Marine Corps have a recruiting office in Berkeley, California. The local anti-war totalitarians of Code Pink have been trying to shut it down. There’s excellent pictorial coverage of the confrontation (if it can be dignified with the term) at Zombietime. My own attention was attracted to all this when I was sent a link to a thoroughly admirable letter sent to the Berkeley Daily Planet by Captain Richard Lund, the Marine officer in charge of the recruitment office.

My attention was also attracted by a poster the recruiting office staff put up in their window, upon which was printed a quote from the English political philosopher John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). Here it is, as represented on the recruiting office poster:

‘War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.’

Looking around the internet, I find that this is a popular quote with those in the U.S. who define themselves as supporting the military, and understandably so. However, it is an inaccurate (in minor ways) and an incomplete quote. Here is the full passage from which this text comes:

‘War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. When people are used as mere human instruments for firing cannon or thrusting bayonets, in the service and for the selfish purposes of a master, such war degrades a people. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice; a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their free choice - is often the means of their regeneration. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.’

The passage comes from Mill’s essay The Contest in America, originally published in Fraser’s Magazine in 1862. In this essay Mill condemns his own country for siding with the Confederacy in the American Civil War, and harshly criticizes those who, to use his own words, ‘cry, Peace, peace’ without considering what ‘peace’ would mean. There are evils worse than war in a good cause: slavery is one such evil. The passage quoted above is not a defence of the waging of war in itself, but a demand that those responsible for taking a state to war should do so when the cause is just, but further, should only do so when the cause is just.

Mill’s words, when read carefully and in context, thus hardly constitute a manifesto for the uncritical support of the military; but a more powerful statement of the role of the armed forces in the cause of liberty and justice could hardly be wished for. Of course, what precisely constitutes ‘liberty and justice’ is open to debate - or at least it is for those of us living in freedom, thanks to the men and women in uniform whose sacrifices keep us in that happy state.

[Note: Mill’s The Contest in America is freely available in full via Google Book Search and Project Gutenberg. The passage quoted above comes from p. 31 of the Little, Brown edition made available by Google. Some of my own thoughts about John Stuart Mill can be found here.]

greycat.org